πŸ€– How AI Is (and Isn’t) Changing Engineering Leadership in 2025



This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Crypto.Andy (DEV)

In 2023 and 2024, AI stormed into the world of software development β€” from GitHub Copilot to AI-powered documentation and internal copilots. It felt like we were at the start of something transformative: faster teams, leaner processes, and smarter tooling.

But the 2025 LeadDev Engineering Leadership Report, which surveyed over 600 engineering leaders, tells a more measured story. While AI adoption is widespread, its actual impact on productivity, team structure, and leadership is more complex β€” and more subtle β€” than many expected.

These are the top takeaways from the report:

  1. 60% of leaders say AI hasn’t meaningfully boosted productivity.
    Most teams reported only small gains (1–10%), and 21% said it had no effect β€” or even a negative one.

  2. AI is not shrinking team sizes.
    Despite headlines about job loss, 54% of leaders don’t expect any headcount reduction due to AI in 2025.

  3. Most common AI uses are still code-related.
    Code generation (47%), refactoring (45%), and documentation (44%) are the top use cases.

  4. Tooling is still in flux.
    Teams are experimenting with different vendors and platforms β€” both for AI capabilities and for measuring engineering performance.

  5. 51% of leaders worry about long-term consequences.
    The top concerns? Code maintainability (49%) and how AI might affect the learning and growth of junior engineers (54%).

What this means for engineering leaders?

The report paints a clear picture: AI isn’t a magic bullet β€” it’s a cultural and operational shift. And as with any shift, success isn’t about the tool itself, but how you integrate it into your team’s reality.

Here are three leadership principles I believe matter most right now:

  1. Anchor AI to Real Problems β€” Not Hype
    If a tool doesn’t solve a specific pain point, it’s just noise. Focus AI adoption on areas where your team already struggles β€” documentation, tests, internal Q&A, repetitive support tasks.

  2. Treat AI as Organizational Change, Not Just Tooling
    AI isn’t just a productivity plugin β€” it changes how work gets done. Engineers need clear guidance, psychological safety to experiment, and aligned expectations around what β€œusing AI” actually looks like.

  3. Create Space for Learning and Exploration
    AI tools are evolving fast. What worked six months ago might be obsolete today. Give your team room to explore, share findings, and build confidence.

Yes, AI can speed up certain tasks. But leadership is about thinking long-term. Some key questions:

  • Is our AI use creating technical debt we don’t see yet?
  • Are junior engineers still learning how to solve problems β€” or just learning to prompt?
  • How will we maintain this codebase 12 months from now?

Right now, AI feels a bit like the early DevOps days β€” chaotic, exciting, inconsistent. But behind the buzz, we’re starting to see the real work of adaptation: evolving processes, retraining teams, and reshaping leadership priorities.


This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Crypto.Andy (DEV)