React State Management in 2025: Context API vs Zustand 🐻

This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Cristian Sifuentes

React State Management in 2025: Context API vs Zustand

Hello developers ,

In 2025, the React ecosystem continues to evolve with new libraries, server-side rendering improvements (React Server Components, Suspense, Next.js 15+), and better developer tooling. But when it comes to global state management, the two most common choices for lightweight apps are still:

• React Context API — built into React itself.
• Zustand — the fast, scalable, hook-first library that has matured into a production-grade standard.

Let’s dive deep and understand their strengths, trade-offs, and when to choose one over the other.

What is Context API?

The Context API is React’s built-in solution for sharing state across components without prop drilling. It uses:

• createContext → to define a context.
• useContext → to consume values inside components.

Example (2025 syntax — still relevant)

import React, { createContext, useContext, useState } from "react";

const MyContext = createContext<{ state: string; setState: (s: string) => void } | null>(null);

export const MyProvider = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => {
  const [state, setState] = useState("default value");

  return (
    <MyContext.Provider value={{ state, setState }}>
      {children}
    </MyContext.Provider>
  );
};

export const MyComponent = () => {
  const context = useContext(MyContext);
  if (!context) throw new Error("MyComponent must be used inside MyProvider");

  return (
    <div>
      <p>{context.state}</p>
      <button onClick={() => context.setState("new value")}>Change State</button>
    </div>
  );
};

Use cases:

• Small to medium state sharing.
• Avoiding prop drilling in nested components.

Limitations (2025):

• Causes unnecessary re-renders in large trees.
• No built-in persistence or middleware.
• Requires boilerplate for complex state.

What is Zustand?

Zustand is a lightweight global state management library that has matured significantly by 2025:

• Built on hooks.
• Optimized for performance (minimal re-renders).
• Offers middleware for persistence, logging, devtools, and async flows.
• Now widely used in Web3 dApps, gaming dashboards, and Next.js server-side apps.

Example Store

import { create } from "zustand";

interface Store {
  state: string;
  setState: (s: string) => void;
}

const useStore = create<Store>((set) => ({
  state: "default value",
  setState: (newState) => set({ state: newState }),
}));

export const MyComponent = () => {
  const { state, setState } = useStore();
  return (
    <div>
      <p>{state}</p>
      <button onClick={() => setState("new value")}>Change State</button>
    </div>
  );
};

Use cases:

• Global state in small → large apps.
• Performance-critical apps (gaming, 3D, Web3).
• Apps requiring persisted state across sessions.

Persisting State in Zustand (2025 Best Practice)

Zustand’s middleware ecosystem makes persistence trivial:

import { create } from "zustand";
import { persist } from "zustand/middleware";

interface Store {
  state: string;
  setState: (s: string) => void;
}

const useStore = create<Store>()(
  persist(
    (set) => ({
      state: "default value",
      setState: (newState) => set({ state: newState }),
    }),
    {
      name: "my-app-store", // key in storage
      version: 1,           // supports migrations
    }
  )
);

Now your state survives refreshes using localStorage/sessionStorage — with migration support for future app versions.

Context API vs Zustand (2025 Comparison)

Feature	Context API	Zustand
Setup	Built-in, no extra deps	Requires installing zustand
Performance	May re-render entire trees	Optimized, minimal re-renders
Scalability	Best for small/medium apps	Great for large apps
Persistence	Manual with localStorage/sessionStorage	Built-in middleware
Boilerplate	Can get verbose with complex state	Very concise
Ecosystem (2025)	Limited to React features	Rich ecosystem (persist, devtools, immer, etc.)

Pros and Cons

Context API

• Pros: Built-in, simple API, no extra dependencies.
• Cons: Performance issues, not scalable, no persistence.

Zustand

• Pros: Scalable, performant, persistence support, middleware.
• Cons: External dependency, small learning curve.

Conclusion (2025)

• Use Context API when:

  • Your state is simple, app is small, and you want zero dependencies.

• Use Zustand when:

  • You need scalability, persistence, and performance.
  • Your app is in production or will grow.

In 2025, many teams use Zustand + React Query (TanStack Query) together, handling both server state and client state efficiently.

Thanks for reading!

If this helped, follow me for more React 2025 insights.

• GitHub: [your-handle]
• Twitter: [your-handle]
• Support: [buymeacoffee link]

Written by: Cristian Sifuentes — Full-stack developer & AI/JS enthusiast, passionate about scaling architectures and teaching dev teams how to thrive in the modern JS ecosystem.

This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Cristian Sifuentes