This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Sanket Gawas
I’ve spent the past month diving deep into developer subreddits, dev forums and youtube playlists to uncover what developers think about AI coding tools. The landscape is more quality driven and fragmented than most analyses suggest with some surprising winners and notable disappointments.
About This Sentiment Analysis
This analysis synthesizes feedback from 100+ sources including Reddit discussions, GitHub issues, developer testimonials and community forums, weighted across technical performance, adoption patterns, pricing concerns and platform specific limitations. The sentiment scores reflect general web sentiment patterns rather than definitive market positions.
I’ll be sharing the detailed criteria, weighting methodology and source breakdown in upcoming issues. Consider this a snapshot of July 2025 developer sentiment.
Dev AI agent sentiments as of July 2025
CLI Agents: The Terminal Power Struggle
Claude Code: The expensive gold standard
Sentiment: Love hate relationship
Claude Code maintains its position as the technical leader, but the cost barrier is real. Developers consistently report superior code quality and architectural thinking compared to alternatives, but the gap between the low tier and max tier plans create genuine friction.
“Claude Code is expensive, reckless, and weirdly fun” captures the developer sentiment perfectly. It’s the tool teams reach for when quality matters more than budget, particularly for complex autonomous coding tasks.
Gemini CLI: The free disappointment
Sentiment: Negative to mixed
This is where my initial research led me astray. Despite Google’s generous free tier offering, developer sentiment around Gemini CLI is surprisingly negative. Multiple users including myself describe it as painfully slow with numerous bugs and a tendency to get caught in repetitive loops. You can read my past report on Gemini CLI here.
The quality gap with Claude Code is significant enough that developers continue paying for Claude despite Gemini CLI being free.
IDE Agents: Integration Wars
Cursor: The dethroned king facing crisis
Sentiment: Mixed to negative & major pricing backlash
Cursor is experiencing a significant user revolt and backlash over pricing and it could impact the platform’s future. The pricing changes triggered widespread developer anger, “Bye Bye, Cursor. When Great Tools Turn Greedy” represents a common sentiment. Users report costs jumping from $50/month to $250/month for identical usage patterns, with some claiming forceful migration of Pro plans without consent.
GitHub Copilot Agent: The steady veteran
Sentiment: Stable positive
GitHub Copilot maintains steady positive sentiment through reliable performance and predictable pricing. The $10/month pricing remains attractive compared to Cursor’s $20-44+ pricing tiers and the deep GitHub ecosystem integration provides genuine workflow advantages for teams already using Microsoft’s development stack.
It is best for enterprise teams prioritizing stability and ecosystem integration over cutting edge features.
Amazon Kiro: The promising newcomer
Sentiment: Neutral to positive – Early but substantive
Amazon’s Kiro focuses on addressing vibe coding problems through spec driven development, emphasizing documentation and planning.
Early testers report positive experiences with the structured development approach. The free preview tier during development is unusually generous for AWS, suggesting confidence in the product’s long term viability.
OpenAI Codex: The ambitious platform with mixed execution
Sentiment: Mixed, trending cautiously positive
OpenAI Codex excels at handling multi task workflows and reducing context switching for experienced developers.
However the dev community is facing frustration on infrequent updates and slow bug fixes, with many developers feeling the project is neglected compared to rapidly evolving competitors. The $200/month Pro plan faces significant pushback, with many questioning whether current value delivery justifies the steep pricing compared to alternatives like Claude Code or Cursor.
Extension Agents: The specialized winners
Firebender: The android development champion
Sentiment: Positive, strong niche performance
Firebender represents a deep specialization in android development ecosystem. The community shows genuine enthusiasm “Best plugin for Android developers PERIOD!!!” and “Saved me so much time and my productivity is at 10x now” represent common developer testimonials.
4.9/5 stars in Android Studio marketplace, native android studio integration, Y Combinator backing with clear growth trajectory, used by engineers at major companies and it is quadrupling daily active users after Y Combinator launch.
JetBrains Junie: The Enterprise team champion
Sentiment: Strong positive – transparent and productive
Junie represents JetBrains’ successful entry into agentic AI development with impressive metrics backing developer satisfaction. “Junie is slow… but absolutely great!” captures the developer sentiment perfectly. It also has a deep integration with IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, and GoLand.
Performance is the biggest pain point for this tool from the negative sentiments. The tool it excels at complex, multi step changes across large codebases but painstakingly slow.
=================
I’m Sanket, helping developers keep up with AI dev tools, latest insights and tips delivered straight to your inbox- TheAIStack.dev
This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Sanket Gawas