AI Models Demystified: What Really Happens Inside an AI Model?



This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Kamal Rawat

💡 Every AI headline sounds the same: “This new model has 70B parameters” or “Trained on 2 trillion tokens”.

Sounds impressive, right? But what does that actually mean for your business – and more importantly, your budget?

Let’s break it down with a practical lens.

🚀 Meet ShopEase: A Startup at a Crossroads
ShopEase, a mid-sized e-commerce startup, launched a chatbot to handle customer queries.

On a small AI model, it worked fine for FAQs.
But when customers asked about refunds, order tracking, or warranty overlaps → the bot fumbled.
The CTO was tempted: “Let’s just upgrade to a bigger model like GPT-4. More parameters = smarter bot, right?”

Not so fast.

🧩 What Parameters Really Mean (Without the Jargon)
Think of parameters as the brain cells of an AI model. More parameters = more “memory” of patterns.

GPT-2 → 1.5B parameters.
GPT-3 → 175B parameters.
GPT-4 → 1.76 to 1.8 trillion parameters.

Training GPT-3 reportedly cost $4.6M in compute. That’s before you even use it.

So when you hear “70B parameters”, don’t think “smarter”. Think “heavier to run, more expensive to maintain”.

💵 Tokens: The Meter That Never Stops Running
Here’s the gotcha most leaders miss: even if you didn’t train it, you still pay per token when you use it.

GPT-4o-mini: ~$0.15 per 1M tokens.
GPT-4: ~$30 per 1M tokens.

👉 That’s a 200x difference in cost.

Back to ShopEase:

Their chatbot handles 1M queries/month.
Average query & answer = 1,000 tokens.
On GPT-4o-mini → $150/month.
On GPT-4 → $30,000/month.

Same queries. Same customers. But $29,850 of “AI tax” each month.

📉 The Hidden Trap of Scaling Blindly
This is why “bigger model = better results” is a dangerous oversimplification.

Scaling without strategy can:

  • Burn budgets (AI bills growing faster than revenue).
  • Add latency (customers waiting 5+ seconds per answer).
  • Hurt ROI (extra cost may not mean happier customers).

ShopEase realized: instead of jumping to a mega-model, they could fine-tune a medium model with their support transcripts for far cheaper — and better aligned to their domain.

✅ Key Takeaway

  • Parameters = capacity (how much the AI can “know”).
  • Tokens = cost (every interaction charges you).
  • Bigger ≠ automatically better.

If you don’t understand these two levers, your AI project isn’t a strategy – it’s a gamble.

👉 Coming next in this series: “Small vs Medium vs Large Models: The Trade-Offs That Matter.”

Have you ever faced the “bigger vs cheaper” AI debate in your org? Did you go for scale or optimize what you had? Drop your story 👇


This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Kamal Rawat