Building a Unified AI Safety Platform – ██FR█████ █INTELL███████████

This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Scott Griffiths

The Challenge: Enterprise AI Safety at Scale

As organizations rush to deploy AI agents in production, they face a critical trilemma: security, cost, and performance. Current solutions force you to choose – you can have secure AI that’s expensive, or cost-effective AI with security gaps.

After working with enterprises struggling with AI deployment, we identified some key pain points:

Fragmented safety tools that don’t work together
No real-time monitoring of AI agent behavior
Cost explosion when implementing proper safety measures
Lack of multi-agent coordination and communication standards

Our response was to build an integrated platform that addresses all these challenges simultaneously.

The Architecture: Breaking the Trilemma with 4 Unified Technologies

Rather than accepting the traditional trade-offs, we designed a unified platform where each technology addresses a different aspect of the security-cost-performance trilemma:

1. Behavioral Contract Engineering (BCE) – Solves Security

A 5-stage validation pipeline that ensures AI safety without sacrificing performance:

Input Validation → Contract Check → Security Analysis → Response Generation → Output Validation

Temperature controls prevent erratic behavior
Content filtering blocks harmful outputs
PII protection ensures compliance
Hallucination detection maintains accuracy

2. Open Agent Stack (OAS) – Solves Performance

Multi-engine AI framework that optimizes performance across 5 LLM providers:

OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-3.5)
Anthropic (Claude 3.5 Sonnet)
xAI (Grok)
Local (Ollama, privacy-focused)
Custom (your own LLM implementations)

Engine-agnostic design means behavioral contracts work identically across all providers.

3. Distributed Agent Communication Protocol (DACP) – Enhances Performance

Enables sophisticated multi-agent workflows for complex tasks:

# Example: 3-stage security workflow
workflow = {
    "threat-analyzer": analyze_threat,
    "risk-assessor": assess_risk, 
    "incident-responder": coordinate_response
}

# Conditional routing based on risk scores
if risk_score >= 7.0:
    workflow.escalate_to("incident-responder")

4. Cortex Cost Optimization – Solves Cost

3-layer intelligent routing system that dramatically reduces AI costs:

Layer 1 (Sensory): Simple pattern matching
Layer 2 (ONNX): Local ML models for common tasks
Layer 3 (LLM): Full reasoning for complex scenarios

Results: 85-95% cost reduction while maintaining safety standards.

Implementation Deep-Dive

Database Schema for Unified Monitoring

-- Agent task tracking across all technologies
CREATE TABLE agent_tasks (
    id STRING PRIMARY KEY,
    agent_id STRING NOT NULL,
    task_type STRING NOT NULL,
    status STRING NOT NULL,
    intelligence_engine STRING,  -- OpenAI, Claude, etc.
    current_stage STRING,        -- BCE validation stage
    progress INTEGER,            -- 0-100%
    confidence_score FLOAT,      -- AI confidence level
    total_duration_ms FLOAT,
    created_at DATETIME,
    updated_at DATETIME
);

-- Real-time metrics for dashboard
CREATE TABLE agent_metrics (
    id STRING PRIMARY KEY,
    agent_id STRING NOT NULL,
    metric_type STRING NOT NULL,  -- cost, success_rate, response_time
    metric_value FLOAT NOT NULL,
    timestamp DATETIME NOT NULL
);

API Design for Cross-Technology Integration

# Unified API endpoints
@app.get("/api/v1/unified/agents")
async def get_agents():
    """Returns agents from OAS, DACP, BCE, and Cortex"""

@app.get("/api/v1/unified/tasks")  
async def get_tasks():
    """Real-time task monitoring across all systems"""

@app.get("/api/v1/unified/metrics")
async def get_metrics():
    """Cost optimization and security metrics"""

Production Deployment Architecture

Tech Stack:

Backend: FastAPI + SQLAlchemy + Alembic migrations
Frontend: Streamlit with real-time updates
Database: SQLite (dev) / PostgreSQL (prod)
Infrastructure: Ubuntu + Nginx + SSL via Let’s Encrypt
Monitoring: Custom metrics collection + systemd services

Deployment:

# Automated Ubuntu deployment script
./scripts/deploy_ubuntu.sh

# Sets up:
# - Python virtual environment
# - Database with migrations  
# - Nginx reverse proxy
# - SSL certificates
# - Systemd services
# - UFW firewall configuration

Real-World Results

Live Demo Platform

https://bce.primevector.dev

System Overview dashboard showing real-time integration of OAS, DACP, BCE, and Cortex technologies

The platform showcases real-time integration of all 4 technologies:

System Overview Tab:

Multi-engine task processing across AI providers
Real-time system health monitoring
Cost savings visualization from Cortex optimization

Live Agent Processing Tab:

Real-time agent activity across OAS engines
BCE security validation in progress
DACP workflow coordination
Per-agent cost tracking and optimization

BCE Security Pipeline Tab:

5-stage validation process visualization
Contract success rate monitoring with safety maintained
Active threat blocking and violation management

Technology Stack Tab:

Complete architecture explanation
Integration points between systems
Performance metrics and capabilities

Live Agent Processing showing real-time agent activity, BCE validation stages, and cost optimization across multiple AI engines

Example Performance Metrics

From typical production deployment:

📊 Security Performance:
- 88% contract success rate (industry target: >85%)
- 6.7ms average validation time (target: <10ms)
- 408 security threats blocked automatically
- 30.2% threat blocking rate

💰 Cost Optimization:
- 90% of tasks routed to Layer 2 (ONNX)
- 27% total cost reduction achieved
- $1.35 average savings per 1,000 tasks
- Real-time cost tracking per agent

🔄 Agent Coordination:
- 15+ active behavioral contracts
- Multi-engine workflow support
- Conditional escalation workflows
- 99.4% agent communication success rate

Technical Challenges Solved

1. Cross-Engine Behavioral Contracts

Making safety rules work identically across OpenAI, Claude, and Grok required careful abstraction:

@behavioural_contract(
    temperature_control={"mode": "strict", "range": [0.1, 0.5]},
    response_contract={"required_fields": ["risk_assessment", "confidence_level"]}
)
def analyze_threat(engine: str, threat_data: str) -> SecurityOutput:
    # Same contract works for any engine
    return engine_router.process(engine, threat_data)

2. Real-Time Cost Tracking

Cortex optimization required transparent cost calculation:

def calculate_routing_cost(task_complexity: float) -> RoutingDecision:
    if task_complexity < 0.3:
        return Route.LAYER_1_SENSORY  # $0.0001 per task
    elif task_complexity < 0.7:
        return Route.LAYER_2_ONNX     # $0.001 per task  
    else:
        return Route.LAYER_3_LLM      # $0.01 per task

3. Agent State Synchronization

DACP workflows needed reliable agent communication:

class WorkflowRuntime:
    def execute_step(self, agent_id: str, task_data: dict):
        # Update unified task tracking
        self.update_agent_status(agent_id, "processing")

        # Execute with BCE validation
        result = self.execute_with_contracts(agent_id, task_data)

        # Route to next agent if needed
        if result.requires_escalation:
            self.route_to_next_agent(result)

Open Source Contributions

Repositories:

OAS Framework: https://github.com/prime-vector/open-agent-spec
DACP Protocol: Integrated workflow orchestration

Community Contributions:

Added 5-engine support to OAS
Integrated behavioral testing framework
Created security agent templates for rapid deployment
Published PyPI package for easy installation

Try It Yourself

Live Demo: https://bce.primevector.dev

Installation:

pip install open-agent-spec
oas init --spec security-threat-analyzer.yaml --output my_agent/

Breaking the AI Trilemma: A New Paradigm

Traditional AI deployment forces an impossible choice between security, cost, and performance. Our unified platform proves this trilemma is a false constraint.

The Old Paradigm:

High Security = High cost, slower performance
Low Cost = Security risks, limited functionality
High Performance = Expensive, potential safety gaps

The New Reality:

Advanced Security via BCE behavioral contracts
85-95% Cost Reduction through Cortex optimization
Enhanced Performance with OAS multi-engine + DACP coordination

Key Takeaways:

Integration over isolation – Unified platforms outperform point solutions
The trilemma is solvable – Smart architecture achieves all three goals
Real-time monitoring is essential – You can’t manage what you can’t see
Multi-engine support future-proofs your AI investments

The future of enterprise AI isn’t about choosing between safety, cost, and performance. It’s about architecting systems that deliver all three simultaneously.

What challenges are you facing with AI safety in production? Let’s discuss in the comments below.

GitHub: https://github.com/prime-vector

Live Demo: https://bce.primevector.dev

Enterprise AI Consulting: https://primevector.com.au/

Dev.to Metadata

---
title: "Building a Unified AI Safety Platform"
published: false
description: "How we built a production AI safety platform integrating BCE, OAS, DACP, and Cortex for enterprise-grade AI agent security and cost optimization"
tags: ai, security, enterprise, python
cover_image: https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/7onu974fnf9xzxhdzqyo.png
canonical_url: 
series: AI Safety Engineering
---

This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Scott Griffiths