This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Moses Daniel Kwaknat
Building scalable systems today isn’t about throwing more servers at the problem, it’s about rethinking how your services talk to each other.
If you’ve ever been burned by tightly coupled REST calls in a microservice architecture, long chains of service-to-service calls, failed transactions halfway through, retry hell, you’re not alone.
Been there. Debugged that.
Let’s talk about the better way: event-driven architecture (EDA).
Microservices Were Supposed to Fix Everything… Right?
In theory, microservices let you:
- Deploy independently
- Scale granularly
- Ship faster
But when your services are glued together with synchronous HTTP calls, you’re still in trouble:
Service A goes down → Service B fails too
Any latency → user feels it
You spend more time writing retries and fallbacks than business logic
That’s when I realized: the real unlock isn’t microservices alone, it’s event-driven microservices.
What Is Event-Driven Architecture?
In event-driven systems, services don’t call each other directly.
They emit events, and other services listen and respond.
participant OrderService
participant Kafka
participant PaymentService
participant InventoryService
participant ShippingService
OrderService->>Kafka: Publish “OrderPlaced”
Kafka->>InventoryService: “OrderPlaced”
Kafka->>PaymentService: “OrderPlaced”
InventoryService->>Kafka: “InventoryReserved”
PaymentService->>Kafka: “PaymentConfirmed”
Kafka->>ShippingService: “OrderReady”
This decoupling is game-changing.
Why It Works Better
Loose coupling
Services don’t know about each other.
You can add or remove consumers anytime.
Resilience
One service fails? Others still run.
Scalability
Scale hot paths (e.g., payment, inventory) independently.
Auditability
Events are logged — you get a trail of everything that happened.
Asynchronous by default
Your users don’t wait while five services call each other like it’s a WhatsApp group chat.
Event Brokers: The Real MVPs
These tools make EDA possible:
Apache Kafka — High-throughput, persistent event log (my go-to)
RabbitMQ — Queue-based messaging with strong delivery guarantees
AWS SNS/SQS — Easy serverless messaging on the cloud
Others — NATS, Pulsar, Redis Streams
Pick one based on your throughput needs, latency tolerance, and operational skillset.
Real-World Flow: Order Processing
Let’s say you place an order. Here’s how the services react:
OrderService emits OrderPlaced
InventoryService listens, reserves items
PaymentService listens, processes payment
ShippingService listens, ships once inventory + payment are confirmed
No service talks to another directly.
No coupling.
Just clean, reactive design.
It’s Not All Rainbows
Yes, event-driven systems are powerful, but they’re not magic.
Here’s what to watch out for:
- Eventual consistency: Not everything is instant.
- Idempotency: Events can be duplicated. Handle it.
- Schema evolution: Plan for versioning your events.
- Debugging: Distributed tracing is a must.
Final Thoughts
If you want systems that are:
Scalable
Resilient
Loosely coupled
Cloud-ready
Then it’s time to look beyond REST.
Start small. Maybe just one async event.
Get a feel for it. Then go deeper.
Because in modern backend systems, the question isn’t:
“Should I use microservices?”
It’s:
“How are my services communicating?”
Written by Moses Daniel Kwaknat, backend engineer, API builder, and dev who’s finally making peace with distributed systems.
Let’s talk microservices, message brokers, or how to escape REST hell 
This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Moses Daniel Kwaknat